Experts in NYT Report Used Infection Fatality Rate Without Any Basis: India

28 May, 2021 16:12 IST|Sakshi Post
Image Source Twitter

The government on Thursday dismissed a recent New York Times (NYT) report on COVID-19 death toll in India as baseless", saying it is not backed by any evidence. At a press conference, the Union health ministry said the report is absolutely false and based on "distorted estimates".

The report titled "Just how big could India's true Covid toll be" estimated 600,000 deaths due to the infection in the country in a conservative scenario, 1.6 million estimated deaths in a more likely scenario and 4.2 million estimated deaths in a worse scenario, by pointing out that the experts quoted in the report used elevated "infection fatality rate" (IFR). Now how is the IFR deduced? It is calculated by dividing the number of deaths by the number of people, who were exposed to the virus as found in a serosurvey. IFR is always lower than the total fatality rate.

Health ministry Joint Secretary Lav Agarwal said, "It is completely baseless and absolutely false and not backed on any evidence." "The question does not arise that Covid-related deaths are getting concealed because, since the beginning, our efforts have been that all cases and deaths are reported in a transparent manner. It is also necessary so that we can understand the overall trajectory of infection and what efforts have to be made so that required actions can be taken for it," he said.

NITI Aayog Member (Health) V K Paul said that "The estimates have been done ad-hoc without any basis... reported cases are a part of a larger universe of total infections in any country," he said. He said the problem in the analysis arises "when certain number is thrown as mortality rate out of that infection".

"If we go with our sero survey, then infection-related mortality is 0.05 per cent and actual mortality is 1.1 per cent... They are taking 0.3 per cent - 6 times - on what basis has it been decided that it is 0.3 per cent of that large infection number - no basis at all," Paul said.

"On what basis this group pulls out infection mortality rate of 0.3 per cent in one scenario and 0.15 another scenario and 0.6 in another scenario? On what basis, this is just an assumption and a feeling of some people and this is something that should have been not published particularly in so called prestigious publication. I submit that we have a strong mortality tracking system which has stood the test of time," he said.

#IndiaFightsCorona#Unite2FightCorona @PMOIndia @drharshvardhan @AshwiniKChoubey @PIB_India @DDNewslive @airnewsalerts @COVIDNewsByMIB @CovidIndiaSeva @NITIAayog @mygovindia @ICMRDELHI https://t.co/Bs6EQSri7L

Also Read: Covid Fatalities At Least 3 Times More Than Actual Numbers: New York Times

More News
Entertainment